Hi All,
Paula here again.
I just managed to take in the shock statement by Mary Hanafin yesterday regarding pulling back the OPFP when the child is 13years of age.
Notwithstanding my first blog on the 27th, which gave a flavour of my own story and my appreciation for being able to avail of this payment for the first time in the life of my now 18 year-old who is in 3rd level education, I really think that this continuing suggestion by Government is an absolute misdirected attack, not simply financially but morally, on lone parents.
She should have stopped to pause on her first actual counter-reason for the suggestion, that is children of Lone Parents are four times likely to live in poverty than any other family circumstances. Does she think that men and women simply decide one day, without any justification, to raise children independently? If she does, I suggest she is taken in hand and schooled by her more educated colleagues on the many routes to finding yourself raising children on your own….I can assure Ms. Hanafin that in the majority of cases the justifications are quite troublesome. She and Government should have looked to the poverty issue first and foremost before ever letting her make this and the next two judgements…
The second of which I believe related to lone parents participation in the workforce, in a statement which she in bad faith pits lone parents against lone parents and I quote her from the Irish Times “It’s not for the want of actually financially supporting people,” she said, adding that there were financial incentives to cover childcare and other costs to encourage people into the workforce. “But as a long-term policy it’s just not working for the interests of the child.” Ms Hanafin stressed that the vast majority of lone parents were working and not in receipt of social welfare payments. “The lone parents who are working away, who are not on social welfare, they’re the ones who really resent the talk about lone parents on welfare and the dependency that some people have. They just get on with their lives.”
Am I losing my memory or have childcare incentives either been cut dramatically or lost entirely over the last 2 years? And what does she mean by the policy not working for the interests of the child? Is she saying that it’s best for the child not to have any stability at home by the presence of a parent because it’s best that the parent is contributing to the economy and bringing home the bacon? Ask the many communities that are suffering from antisocial activity, the Justice Programmes and Youth Organisations etc., just how much they’ve had to compensate over the last 10-15 years for the lack of parental supervision because the only parent is out trying to make ends meet! This is by no means to cast aspersions on the children of lone parents, as children of traditional households are also losing out in the same way as couples are forced into the economy to make ends meet also.
On the 3rd and last of Ms Hanafin’s reasons for making the suggestion to pull back the payment, I take absolutely greatest offence. It is an abomination that she should put forward a very clear MORAL attack on the unfortunate situation of a lone parent, who for many reasons is alone and not often by choice as he/she may still be affected in many ways that we will never comprehend by his/her situation of being ‘left alone’ either through youth pregnancy, divorce, widowed, whatever, and to use lone parents and the only financial stability that they have, particularly in this climate, is an absolute disgrace and she should be ashamed for having said that “This payment’ of all things, and I quote again from the Irish Times “…just mitigates against that lone parent herself having a stable relationship or marrying.”
Who let this woman loose with that perspective? Have they all gone mad? The decision of a lone parent to enter or not into a relationship, I can assure you may cloud the issue for the person initially but fundamentally it has very little in the end to do with this life saving payment for people raising children on their own. The Minister should never again speak of marriage and any relation to this very plain fact again.
I can only guess that this attack, which is a very moral and inappropriate one, is misplaced as we all have heard the plight, quite separately, from single individuals who are not lone parents and the actual majority in this country, who enter in partnerships and marriages and find that they are less off because of the tax and other government issues related to the married couple in Ireland. But let’s be very clear. The issue of a life saving one parent family payment to care for the adult and the child (children) living on the margins is a very separate and independent issue to the plight of married couples looking for greater incentives, or in the least the abolition of current penalties that they experience having already gotten married. These are very different issues, let’s keep them that way.
Lastly, no-one can know what difficulties lay around the corner when you head up a lone parent household, and children are staying at home longer and without clearer prospects than ever before in Ireland. Raising this suggestion again at this time, or at any time in my view, is poor judgement once again. And I urge other Lone Parents to speak out against this Moral Attack by Mary Hanafin in particular on all Lone Parents (on the payment or not). Disgraceful!
Paula